Seongbin Sim vs Shinji Hazawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 12:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Sim vs S. Hazawa

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sim 1 - 0 Hazawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Seongbin Sim winning 2 and Shinji Hazawa winning 0. The last match between Seongbin Sim and Shinji Hazawa was at the M15 Wuning, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Seongbin Sim getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sim | 1 |
| Hazawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Wuning(08-06-25)
S. Sim vs S. Hazawa H2H Profile
S. Sim vs S. Hazawa Match Preview:
- Recent form analysis reveals that Hazawa has a slight edge in second-serve points, securing 46.64% compared to Sim's 44.08%. Will this marginal difference tilt the scales in favor of Hazawa?
- Examining return game data, Sim appears superior, winning 47.17% of opponent's second serve points, where Hazawa wins 43.94%. Is Sim's return game potent enough to decide the match?
- In terms of saving breakpoints under pressure, Hazawa narrowly leads with a 57.78% success rate, compared to Sim's 56.35%. Could breakpoint resilience be a crucial deciding factor?
- Sim shows a stronger overall match win percentage over the last year, with 62.12% compared to Hazawa's 47.5%. Is this consistency indicative of a higher chance of victory?
- Both players have different preferred surfaces, with Hazawa best on hard courts (59%) and Sim on indoor hard courts (75%). Will the match surface play a pivotal role?
- On the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuit, Sim's winning record stands at 62.9%, surpassing Hazawa's 46.88%. Is experience in higher-level play an advantage here?
- The quality of opposition faced in the past year highlights Sim, playing against higher-ranked opponents (average rank 241.97), compared to Hazawa's average of 360.73. Does playing tougher opponents give Sim a competitive edge?
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Sim has a better record, winning 39% of such sets, while Hazawa lags at 27%. Is the ability to perform in clutch moments crucial for Sim's potential success?
- In terms of break point conversion, Hazawa is slightly ahead, converting 30.11% of opportunities against Sim's 26.23%. Can this difference in breaking serve prove consequential?
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
When evaluating both players' recent performances and comparative statistics, slight advantages emerge in different areas. While Hazawa demonstrates skill in serving and breaking under pressure, Sim excels in returning and overall match consistency.
Sim's higher winning percentage over the last year and stronger performance against higher-ranked opponents suggest a readiness and capability to handle pressure-filled match situations better.
Additionally, Sim's ability to win deciding sets could play a pivotal role if the match extends into a tight finish. Considering these aspects, Sim is more likely to emerge as the victor in this upcoming encounter.
Seongbin Sim vs Shinji Hazawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Sim vs S. Hazawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:10:34 | Average Match Time | 1:10:34 |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve % | 46% (17/37) |
| 74% (23/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 62% (23/37) | Return Points Win % | 33% (15/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Sim Recent Matches Played
S. Hazawa Recent Matches Played

S. Sim vs S. Hazawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.58% (95/70) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.03% (144/113) |
| 57.37% (214/159) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.86% (322/265) |
| 52.36% (1864/1696) | Games Win/Loss | 52.25% (2883/2635) |
| 55.08% (65/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.11% (129/93) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 71.43% (20/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.67% (10/14) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 324 | Aces Total | 824 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 267 | Total Double Faults | 432 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:27:53 |
| 248.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.1 |
| 60% (3137/5232) | 1st Serve % | 65% (9284/14221) |
| 67% (2090/3137) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6307/9284) |
| 49% (1025/2095) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2446/4937) |
| 42% (224/530) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (567/1416) |
| 40% (2069/5161) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5756/14561) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Challenger W/L | 42.31% (22/30) |
| 57.76% (93/68) | Futures W/L | 59.51% (122/83) |
| 58% (94/162) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (137/250) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 62% (23/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (33/61) |
| 45% (20/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (36/77) |
| 90% (96/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (145/118) |
| 10% (96/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (145/27) |
| 13% (69/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (111/24) |